Head in the clouds: two new microendemic tepui-summit species of Stefania (Anura: Hemiphractidae)

In addition to the type locality (the summit of Aprada-tepui, Bolívar State of Venezuela), the distribution of the egg-brooding frog Stefania satelles was long thought to include several isolated tabletop mountain (tepui) summits surrounding the large Chimantá Massif in Bolívar State (hence the Latin name “satelles”). However, multilocus molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that this taxon includes several undescribed morphologically cryptic species, and that S. satelles should be restricted to its type locality. Two tepui-summit species confused under that name in the literature remain to be named, and the present paper aims at describing these populations previously referred to as Stefania sp. 3 and S. sp. 5. Stefania sp. 3 is only known from the small summit of Angasima-tepui, while S. sp. 5 is only reported from the small summit of Upuigma-tepui, both mountains being located south of the Chimantá Massif. These new, phylogenetically distinct species are described based on external morphology and osteology and in comparison to close relatives in the S. ginesi clade, which consists exclusively of tepui summit species. Both new species have highly restricted geographic ranges (less than 3 km2) and should be listed as Critically Endangered according to IUCN criteria.


Introduction
The genus Stefania belongs to the frog family Hemiphractidae, a Neotropical lineage currently comprising six genera and more than 120 species [1].Hemiphractids are mostly characterised by a unique breeding behaviour consisting of females carrying eggs on their back, either exposed or enclosed in dorsal pouches [2].In Stefania the exposed eggs are glued to the female's dorsum Stefania species are likely threatened by ongoing and projected climate change (e.g., [11]), a common fate of Pantepui amphibian lineages (e.g., [12]).Several morphologically cryptic species have been reported in the genus [10,13,14], and the present work aims at describing two Stefania populations long confused with S. satelles, and previously referred to as Stefania sp. 3 and S. sp. 5 [10,15].Both species are seemingly single tepui summit endemics, with S. sp. 3 only known from the small summit of Angasima-tepui (summit surface ca.2.5 km 2 ), and S. sp. 5 only reported from the small summit of Upuigma-tepui (summit surface ca.2.3 km 2 ), both mountains being located south of the Chimantá Massif in the Bolívar state of southern Venezuela (Fig. 1).The summits of Angasima-tepui and Upuigma-tepui are presently strongly isolated from each other, and from other summits of the Chimantá Massif, by large stretches of upland rainforest and savannah and by substantial watercourses, such as the rivers Aparurén and Arawac (Figs. 1 and 2).The two new species are allopatric, and morphologically and phylogenetically distinct from other Stefania species in the ginesi clade, which exclusively consists of tepui summit species found at elevations between 2,115 and 2,580 m.The S. ginesi clade as currently recognized [10, 13, 15; this paper] is endemic to the Chimantá Massif and a few peripheral tepuis in southeastern Venezuela.

Specimens examined
Specimens examined for this study are listed in the Appendix and in the new species descriptions below.Specimens of the two new species were registered in the collections of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (IRSNB; Brussels, Belgium) under the name Stefania satelles for more than a decade, but have now been assigned new museum numbers according to their new status as type specimens.

Micro-computed tomography (µCT) scanning, 3D reconstructions, and osteology
Specimens were µCT-scanned at the Natural History Museum's (NHM, London) CT Lab facility using a Nikon HMX225.All osteological images were exported from the virtual 3D models, which were reconstructed and segmented using VGStudio MAX version 2.1.Threedimensional mesh files of full bodies (including new fullbody µCT-scans of the holotype and one paratype of S. lathropae) and crania have been deposited on the Mor-phoSource platform at the following URL: https://www.morphosource.org/projects/000642378. Osteological terminology follows Trueb [30] and Duellman [2], and osteological description follows the scheme of Kok [15,28].The term "exostosis" is used for "dermal sculpturing" (e.g., [31]).Estimation of the degree of contact between bony structures followed Kok et al. [32], i.e., contacting/ in contact = contact between structures with a visible suture line, and fused = contact between structures with a suture line being barely visible or absent.Osteological comparisons with other species in the Stefani ginesi clade were based on Kok [15,28] and on examination of newly acquired µCT data of S. lathropae.

Results
Both new species are placed in the Stefania ginesi clade based on molecular data (see [10,14]; Fig. 3) and morphological features.Members of the S. ginesi clade are exclusively found on tepui summits and are mainly characterized by (1) small to medium size (< 65 mm SVL); (2) head about as wide as long; (3) dorsal skin tuberculate; (4) canthus rostralis tuberculate; (5) low parietal crests; (6) toes basally webbed; (7) iris generally unicolour-or faintly bicolour-copper, dark brown, or greyish blue in life; (8) males with nuptial excrescences on thumb.Such a combination of characters is not found in any other known Stefania clade.
Although these data are only exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously (see [33]), the molecular Vegetation on the summit of Angasima-tepui.(E).Upuigma-tepui as seen from the summit of Angasima-tepui.(F-H).Vegetation on the summit of Upuigma-tepui.Photos by the author divergence between the two new species is 3.2% in the barcoding fragment of 16S rRNA (see [15]; summarised in Table 1).Molecular divergence with S. lathropae (the closest described relative) varies from 3.2 to 3.4% (S. imawari sp.nov.) and from 4.5 to 4.7% (S. upuigmae sp.nov.) (Table 1).Intraspecific genetic divergences in species of the S. ginesi clade vary from 0 to 0.2%, which is identical to the intraspecific divergences observed in species of the S. riveroi clade, including across allopatric populations [28].Etymology.The specific epithet imawari is a noun used in apposition and refers to the malicious spirits that inhabit the tepuis, according to Pemón traditional beliefs (Arturo Berti, pers.comm.).The Pemón are indigenous people living in the southeast region of Venezuela, including the area surrounding the type locality.

Stefania satelles [in part]
Definition and diagnosis.Stefania imawari sp.nov. is characterized by the following morphological characters, the combination of which distinguishes it from all known congeners: (1) a small species of Stefania, max.SVL in preserved adult females 55.4 mm (n = 3), 48.9 mm in adult preserved males (n = 5); (2) head not distinctly longer than wide, about as wide as long; (3) canthus rostralis angular, slightly concave in dorsal view (almost straight), tuberculate, 1-3 distinctly enlarged canthal tubercles that project dorsolaterally, ill-defined canthal stripe present in life; (4) loreal region with a few low tubercles; (5) upper eyelid smooth to tuberculate, none of the tubercles distinctly enlarged; (6) frontoparietal ridges present, but low and barely visible (both in life and in preservative); (7) frontoparietal crests barely developed (on cranium); (8) constriction of the frontoparietal bones at the level of the anterior epiotic eminence; (9) low, sometimes extensive, exostosis on the cranium; (10) premaxillae slightly projecting posteriorly in lateral view; 11) posterodorsal projection of maxilla absent or highly reduced; 12) maxillary process of the nasal not in contact with the maxilla; 13) horizontal length of tympanum more than 50% horizontal length of eye in both sexes; 14) vomerine teeth 3-7; 15) toes basally webbed, no significant difference in toe webbing between sexes; 16) dorsal skin (in life) tuberculate; 17) ventral skin (in life) granular; 18) absence of a conspicuous/enlarged outer tarsal tubercle; 19) two large, creamy brown, medially fused, nuptial excrescences present on the thumb in males; 20) absence of multiple conspicuous dark brown bars on flanks and lips, absence of white dorsolateral stripes (in life); 21) in living adults, iris faintly bicolour, dark brown/dark copper, with extensive dark brown reticulations; a faint blueish-grey tint may be present depending on the luminosity.
Stefania imawari sp.nov. is further distinguished from the other described species in the S. ginesi clade as follows: From Stefania ginesi mostly by the colour of the iris (greyish blue in S. ginesi vs. dark brown/dark copper in S. imawari sp.nov., although in a few specimens the iris may have a faint blueish grey tint, depending on the luminosity); by the size and number of tubercles on the dorsum, flanks, and arms/legs (distinctly larger and more numerous in S. ginesi); by a more angular canthus rostralis (less defined in S. ginesi); and by the size of tubercles on the canthus rostralis and upper eyelid (larger in S. ginesi).
From Stefania lathropae mostly by the absence of white dorsolateral stripes (always present, even if sometimes short, in S. lathropae); by the supratympanic fold barely obscuring the upper margin of the tympanum (vs.distinctly obscuring the upper margin of the tympanum in S. lathropae); and by the colour of the iris (unicolour, copper in S. lathropae vs. faintly bicolour, dark brown/ dark copper in S. imawari sp.nov.).Notable potential osteological diagnostic characters are the length of the postchoanal process of the vomer (long and reaching the neopalatine in S. lathropae vs. short in S. imawari sp.nov.); and the length of the dorsal process on the anterior ramus of the pterygoid projecting towards the zygomatic ramus of the squamosal (longer in S. lathropae).
From Stefania satelles mostly by the osteology of the frontoparietal crests (moderately developed and distinctly projecting dorsolaterally in S. satelles vs. barely developed in S. imawari sp.nov.); and by the colour of the iris (unicolour, copper in S. satelles vs. faintly bicolour, dark brown/dark copper in S. imawari sp.nov.).
Description of the holotype.An adult female 48.5 mm SVL (Figs. 4, 5 and 6), in good condition except for long incisions made during tissue sampling (left thigh) and during the examination of internal organs (left side of the abdomen).Head slightly wider than long; head wider than neck.Snout rounded in dorsal and lateral views, slightly mucronate in dorsal view, ca.1.3 times the horizontal length of eye.Eye-nostril distance ca.0.9 times the horizontal length of eye, more than three times the distance between the nostril and the tip of the snout.Canthus rostralis angular, slightly concave in dorsal view, sloping; lips flared.Nostrils protuberant, directed anterolaterally.Internarial distance ca.50% of interorbital distance.Internarial region concave.Interorbital distance slightly longer than upper eyelid width.Frontoparietal ridges low and barely visible.Temporal region slightly bulged.Tympanum distinct, large, round, directed posterolaterally, 64% of horizontal length of eye, separated from eye by ca.59% of horizontal length of eye.Supratympanic fold prominent, extending from posterior corner of eye to above insertion of forelimb, barely obscuring upper margin of tympanum.
Choanae small and oval.Vomerine processes transverse between choanae, not in contact, larger than choanae, each bearing ca.seven teeth.Tongue large, ovoid.Palpebral membrane not reticulated, upper rim with a light brown band.Dorsal skin tuberculate, venter and posterior surface of thighs granular; a few low tubercles on shank and lower arm.Upper eyelid tuberculate, none of these tubercles is distinctly enlarged.Loreal region with a few low tubercles.Tympanic region strongly tuberculate.Canthus rostralis tuberculate, 1-2 canthal tubercles distinctly enlarged and projecting dorsolaterally.Cloacal opening directed posteriorly at upper level of thighs, presence of a short cloacal flap.
Thenar tubercle large, distinct, transversely oval; palmar tubercle distinct, about half the size of thenar tubercle.Subarticular tubercles distinct, large, projecting, and single in appearance.Supernumerary tubercles numerous, most of them large and projecting (Fig. 6).Relative finger lengths II < I < IV < III; adpressed second finger barely reaches the first finger's disc.Fingers with lateral fringes; no distinct webbing between FIII-FIV, which are fused proximally.Finger discs large, transversely oval, more than two times wider than adjacent phalange on FIII and FIV, smallest and subequal in length on FI and FII, largest and subequal in length on FIII-IV.Largest disc width (FIV) 87% of horizontal length of tympanum.
Inner metatarsal tubercle large, oval, distinct; outer metatarsal tubercle not detectable on left foot, on right foot about 5.2 times smaller than inner, round, poorly distinct, very similar to surrounding supernumerary tubercles, but slightly darker.Subarticular tubercles single, round, distinct.Supernumerary tubercles numerous, round, distinct, most of them similar in size (Fig. 6).Relative lengths of toes I < II < III < V < IV; adpressed fifth toe distinctly longer than third.Toes basally webbed, webs tapering to lateral fringes.Webbing formula II 1 ¾-3 III 2 − -3 ½ IV 3 ¼-2 V. Toe discs oval, wider than adjacent phalange, largest toe disc on Toe IV, ca.81% width of largest finger disc.Heels overlapping when hindlimbs are folded at right angles to sagittal body plane.
Colour of holotype in life.Dorsum light to medium brown with a few creamy white/beige spots, often circled in black and often corresponding to large tubercles (Fig. 4).Upper flanks similar to dorsum, lower flanks similar to dorsum medially, but greyish brown anteriorly and posteriorly.Flanks speckled with brown, dark brown, and creamy white/beige small spots.Anterodorsal aspect of upper and lower arm light brown, with a few brown and creamy white/beige/black small spots.Anterodorsal aspect of thigh and shank light brown, with a few brown and creamy white/beige small spots.Hands and feet greyish brown speckled with small brown and creamy white/ beige/black spots.Top of head and upper eyelid medium brown, similar to dorsum.Canthal stripe barely visible, dark brown; short black supratympanic stripe present; post-tympanic region dark brown.Tympanum dark brown, almost black, with a few tiny creamy white speckles; tympanum circled in creamy white.Upper lip creamy white, with some scattered melanophores more obvious and numerous anteriorly; lower lip greyish brown with a few dark brown markings.Throat and anterior thorax creamy white with medium brown speckles on throat.Venter and underside of limbs light/medium grey, with some rare dark brown mottling, especially under knee.The belly is slightly translucent (some internal organs visible).Palms and soles dark grey.Iris faintly bicolour, light copper on its upper part, light bluish grey on its lower part, with extensive dark brown reticulations.Eye mostly circled in creamy white.
Colour of holotype in preservative.After almost 13 years in ethanol preservative (Fig. 5), the overall colouration has faded but remains similar compared to the condition in life.The ventral face turned opaque creamy brown, and the medium brown speckling became darker and more conspicuous.Palms turned creamy brown, and soles are now dark greyish brown.
Osteology of holotype.Cranium (Fig. 8).The skull is large, wider than long (greatest width ca.127% of medial length).The braincase appears mostly ossified; the sphenethmoid complex is not dorsally invested by the nasals.The exoccipital-prootic complex is well ossified and laterally barely overlapped by the otic ramus of the squamosal.The paired septomaxillae are well developed and lie dorsal to the palatine process and posterolaterally to the articulation between the maxilla and premaxilla.The columellae (stapes) are ossified, formed by the synostotic fusion of the long, thin pars media plectri (stylus) and the pars interna plectri (baseplate), which is curved.
Dorsal investing bones.The nasals are broad, slightly exostosed, not contacting medially.The posteromedial margins of the nasals do not invest the sphenethmoid.
The maxillary process of the nasal is long, acuminate, slightly curved in dorsal view (concave), not in contact with the maxilla.The frontoparietals are slightly exostosed and completely roof the central braincase from the anterior level of the orbit to the level of the tectum synoticum posteriorly.Lamina perpendicularis poorly developed along the anterior orbital margin of the frontoparietal, expanding posteriorly.Posteriorly, the Ventral investing and palatal bones.The parasphenoid is nib-shaped, forming the floor of the braincase.The pointed cultriform process overlaps the sphenethmoid ventrally.The parasphenoid alary processes provide the floor for the otic capsules and form a slightly obtuse angle with the parasphenoid/cultriform process.The posteromedial process of the parasphenoid is truncate and almost reaches the margin of the foramen magnum.The parasphenoid alary processes are not in contact with the long medial ramus of the pterygoid.The massive neopalatine is fused posteromedially to the sphenethmoid.Postchoanal vomers are almost straight, clearly distinguishable, anterior to the neopalatine.Each vomer bears ca.seven teeth.The postchoanal process of the vomer is short and does not reach the neopalatine.The neopalatine does not connect to the inner surface of the maxilla.
Maxillary arcade.Both maxillae and premaxillae are dentate, apparently not exostosed.The premaxillae are separated medially, slightly inclined anteriorly.The alary processes of the premaxillae are broad and acuminate posteriorly, diverging from the midline.The alary processes are directed posterodorsally and have a moderate indentation along their anteromedial base.In dorsal view, the alary processes reach the level of the anteriormost margin of the maxillae.The palatine (medial) process of the premaxillae is long, acuminate, directed posterodorsally.The lateral process of the premaxillae is short, about half the size of the palatine process, acuminate and directed posterolaterally.The premaxillae do not contact the maxillae, although the maxillae slightly invest the premaxillae on both side.The maxillae are greatly expanded and the pars facialis is well developed, but not in contact with the maxillary process of the nasal.Anteriorly and in lateral view, the maxillae are squarish and about twice as high as posteriorly.The maxillae possess a highly reduced (almost non-existent) posterodorsal projection directed towards the zygomatic ramus of the squamosal with which it is not in contact.Posteriorly, the maxillae are in close contact with, but not fused to, the robust quadratojugals.
Suspensory apparatus.The triradiate pterygoid is moderately slender.The anterior ramus extends toward the braincase from the maxilla at the mid-orbit level and further extends against the anteroventral margin of the otic capsule via the long medial ramus.There is no contact between the otic capsule and the medial ramus.The posterior ramus is broad and flat, not in contact with the ventral ramus of the squamosal.The posterior ramus is slightly shorter than the medial.There is a short dorsal process on the anterior ramus projecting towards the zygomatic ramus of the squamosal, but not contacting it.The quadratojugal is robust, in contact with, but not fused to, the maxilla.The otic and ventral rami of the squamosal are well developed; the otic ramus does not extend over the lateral margin of the prootic.The ventral ramus of the squamosal is almost straight, narrow in lateral view, and extends from the quadratojugal to the posterodorsal margin of the orbit.The otic ramus is acuminate, smooth, and less than half the length of the narrower zygomatic ramus.The otic ramus bears a low crest laterally.The zygomatic ramus is long, slim, and acuminate in lateral profile, not in contact with the maxilla.The zygomatic rami do not appear exostosed.
Mandible.The dentary is long and moderately stout, posteriorly acuminate, fused to the small, arcuate mentomeckelian bone anteriorly.The mentomeckelians are separated medially.The dentary overlaps almost half of the angulosplenial length.The main component of the mandible is the angulosplenial, which is long and sigmoid, acuminate anteriorly.Anteriorly and in ventral view, the angulosplenial fails to extend near the maxilla-premaxilla articulation.The coronoid process is dorsomedial and well-developed, about half of the posterior ramus of the pterygoid.
Postcranium (Fig. 9).The vertebral column is composed of eight non-imbricate, procoelous presacral vertebrae, sacrum, and urostyle.The atlantal cotylar arrangement corresponds to the Type I of Lynch [35].Presacrals I-III expand dorsally.The transverse processes are moderately elongated, distally expanded on presacral II-IV.The length of the transverse processes is III > VIII = VII > VI > IV > V > II.The transverse processes of presacral II are directed roughly perpendicularly and ventrally to the medial axis; those of presacral III are directed posteroventrally; transverse processes of presacral IV to VII are directed posterodorsally; and those of presacral VIII are directed perpendicular and dorsally to the medial axis.Presence of small, paired calcified processes (likely calcified endolymphatic sacs; [36]) extending through the intervertebral foramina, but not, or barely, investing the ventral face of the transverse processes of the vertebrae.The sacral diapophyses are slightly flattened, expanded distally, and of a length similar to that of the transverse processes of presacral III.The sacral diapophyses are directed posterodorsally, with truncate distal borders and are not in contact with the ilia distally.The sacrum has a bicondylar articulation with the urostyle.The urostyle is similar in length to the presacral vertebral column, with its posterior tip upturned.Urostyle with a well-developed dorsal crest along most of its shaft.The crest originates anteriorly as a large, ossified tubercle and progressively decreases in height posteriorly.The pectoral girdle is arciferal.The clavicles are robust, flattened, arcuate, directed anteriorly, and moderately separated from each other medially; the clavicle appears to be barely in contact with the scapula and not attached to the coracoid.The posterior margin of the stout coracoid is weakly sigmoid, whereas the anterior margin is concave.The coracoids are separated and expanded medially, the concave glenoid and convex sternal ends are about equally expanded, almost three times as wide as the midshaft width of the bone.The cleithrum is dagger-shaped, the suprascapular cartilage appears to not be ossified.The head of the humerus is not ossified.A well-developed crista ventralis extends along the proximal half of the humerus.The crista lateralis is well visible in ventral (flexor) view, while the low crista medialis is only visible in lateral view.The capitulum and ulnar and radial condyles appear to be well developed but decalcified.The olecranon of the radio-ulna is round, the sulcus intermedius is indicated by a distinct groove; the epiphyses of the radius and ulna are decalcified, as well as all carpal elements and the prepollex (which is not visible).The finger phalangeal formula is standard (2-2-3-3), and the metacarpals increase in size in the following order: II, IV, I and III.The relative lengths of the fingers increase in size in the following order: II, I, IV, and III.The third metacarpal is too decalcified to detect the distal process (which is visible in the µCT-scanned paratype, see Variation).The distal phalanges are slightly curved downwards with pointed tips.The postsacral trunk region is relatively short and narrow.The articulation between the anterior end of the ilial shafts and the ventral side of the distal ends of the sacral transverse processes is of the sagittal-hinge type [37], usually characteristic of long-distance jumpers.The ilial shafts have large crests along almost their entire length, originating approximately at the level of the urostyle tubercle and terminating in a posterior prominence.The ilia are posteriorly in contact with the ischium but are apparently not fused to it.The pubis is decalcified; the acetabulum appears round and well developed.The femur is slightly shorter than the tibiofibula.The femur is weakly sigmoid and bears a posteroventral ridge on its proximal end.The sulcus intermedius of the tibiofibula is much less prominent than the sulcus intermedius of the radio-ulna.The astragalus and calcaneum are about two-thirds the size of the tibiofibula.These structures are widely separated at their midpoint and fused at their distal and proximal heads.Tarsal elements are highly decalcified, therefore difficult to appreciate.The toe phalangeal formula is standard (2-2-3-4-3), and the metatarsals increase in size in the following order: I, II, III, V, IV.The relative lengths of the toes increase in the same order.The phalangeal elements are decalcified, the ultimate phalange of the toes appears to be similar in shape and size to that of the fingers.
Variation.As in many Stefania species, S. imawari sp.nov. is polychromatic (Fig. 7), and polychromatism does not seem to be related to sex. Adult individuals range from almost plain golden brown, chestnut brown, medium brown to dark greenish brown, with more or less extensive dark brown markings and/or creamy white/beige spots and stripes on the dorsal surfaces.A few faint light greenish brown chevrons are visible on the dorsum of a small immature female (Fig. 7B).Dorsal surface of thighs may be immaculate or bear conspicuous transverse bars.In life, a canthal dark brown/black stripe is present in all specimens examined (usually not visible in preservative); no specimen had a distinct interorbital bar.Iris faintly bicolour in all specimens examined, a faint blueish grey tint is rarely present.The dorsal skin condition (tuberculate) is similar across specimens examined, with no major difference detected.Males are smaller than females: 44.1-48.9mm SVL in adult males (n = 5) vs. 48.5-55.4mm SVL in adult females (n = 3).Head is slightly longer than wide, or slightly wider than long.The number of vomerine teeth ranges from three to seven.There is no significant difference in toe webbing between the sexes; toe webbing -for all adult males (n = 5) is II 1 3 V. One female (IRSNB 4217) has basal webbing between the first and second toe (I 2-2 1 / 2 II).All males examined have detectable nuptial excrescences (Fig. 10), and a slightly darker throat than females, especially along the lower lip and under the corner of the mouth (better appreciated in preservative).There is a small distal process on the third metacarpal in the µCT-scanned paratype, which has its extremities less decalcified than the holotype.The carpus is easier to appreciate in that specimen, and is composed of a radiale, ulnare, ossified prepollex element, element Y, distal carpal 2 and an element representing the fusion of distal carpals 3-5 (dcpl 3-5).Both ulnare and dcpl 3-5 display a lateral apophysis on their dorsal border.Tarsal elements are also easier to appreciate in the paratype, with the presence of two tarsals (distal tarsal 1 and an element representing the fusion of distal tarsals 2-3) at the base of Toes II-III.A small element Y and a short ossified prehallux element are also present, at the base of Toe I.
Distribution and natural history.Stefania imawari sp.nov. is only known from the type locality, i.e., the summit of Angasima-tepui between 2,122 and 2,154 m elevation (Figs. 1 and 2).The species may be present on Katurantepui, a neighbouring mountain referred as Angasimatepui "W branch" in Gorzula and Señaris [34] in their account on Stefania satelles, but this should be confirmed by molecular data as the summits of Katuran-tepui and Angasima-tepui are presently well isolated from each other.
The summit of Angasima-tepui is a mix of exposed rocks and richly vegetated areas, described as "low tepuisummit scrub and meadows on peat and rock" by McDiarmid and Donnelly [9] (Fig. 2).The summit is fractured into a southern and a northern part by a wide canyon mostly covered by low-growing tepui forest.
Specimens of Stefania imawari sp.nov.were found active at night, mostly sitting on rocks or on the top of the bromeliad Brocchinia hechtioides.One female was found inside a B. hechtioides.A few specimens were on the ground on low vegetation at night, and three specimens were found hiding under rocks during the day.No female carrying eggs or juveniles was observed during a short stay on the summit of Angasima-tepui (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) May 2011, i.e., during the rainy season), but one female (IRSNB 4220, 55.4 mm SVL) retained a glutinous patch on the back (Fig. 7E).Stefania upuigmae sp.nov. is further distinguished from the other described species in the S. ginesi clade as follows: From Stefania ginesi principally by the colour of the iris (greyish blue in S. ginesi vs. medium brown/copper in S. upuigmae sp.nov.); by the size and number of tubercles on the dorsum, flanks, and limbs (distinctly larger and more numerous in S. ginesi); by a more angular canthus rostralis (less defined in S. ginesi); and by the size of tubercles on the canthus rostralis and upper eyelid (larger in S. ginesi).
From Stefania imawari sp.nov.principally by a heavily mottled belly (vs.no mottling in S. imawari sp.nov.); by a unicolour iris in life (vs.faintly bicolour in S. imawari sp.nov.); by the presence of enlarged supernumerary plantar tubercles and an enlarged outer metatarsal tubercle (not enlarged in S. imawari sp.nov.); by the size of the choanae (distinctly larger in S. upuigmae); and by the size of the odontophores and the number of vomerine teeth (odontophores distinctly shorter with much less teeth in the holotype of S. upuigmae sp.nov.).
From Stefania lathropae mostly by the absence of white dorsolateral stripes (always present, even if sometimes short, in S. lathropae).A notable potential osteological diagnostic character is the length of the postchoanal process of the vomer (long and reaching the neopalatine in S. lathropae vs. short in S. upuigmae sp.nov.).
From Stefania satelles mostly by the condition of the frontoparietal crests (moderately developed and distinctly projecting dorsolaterally in S. satelles vs. barely developed in S. upuigmae sp.nov.); and by the shape of the snout in lateral view (sloping from below the nostrils in S. satelles vs. sloping from the nostrils in S. upuigmae sp.nov.).
Description of the holotype.An adult female 53.1 mm SVL (Figs. 11,12 and 13), in good condition except for long incisions made during tissue sampling (left thigh) and during the examination of internal organs (left side of the abdomen).Head slightly wider than long, wider than neck.Snout rounded in dorsal and lateral views, slightly mucronate in dorsal view, ca.1.5 times the horizontal length of eye.Eye-nostril distance ca.1.1 times the horizontal length of eye, more than three times the distance between the nostril and the tip of the snout.Canthus rostralis angular, slightly concave in dorsal view (almost straight), sloping; lips flared.Nostrils protuberant, directed anterolaterally.Internarial distance almost 70% of interorbital distance.Internarial region concave.Interorbital distance slightly shorter than upper eyelid width.Frontoparietal ridges are low and barely visible.Temporal region slightly bulged.Tympanum distinct, large, round, directed posterolaterally, 73% of horizontal length of eye, separated from eye by ca.58% of horizontal length of eye.Supratympanic fold prominent, extending from posterior corner of eye to above insertion of forelimb, obscuring upper margin of tympanum.
Choanae large and oval.Vomerine processes transverse between choanae, not in contact, smaller than choanae, each bearing ca.1-4 teeth.Tongue large, ovoid.Palpebral membrane not reticulated, upper rim with a light brown band.
Dorsal skin tuberculate, venter and posterior surface of thighs granular; a few low tubercles on shank.Upper eyelid mostly smooth, no enlarged tubercle on upper eyelid.Loreal region with a few low tubercles.Tympanic region strongly tuberculate.Canthus rostralis tuberculate, one canthal tubercle distinctly enlarged and projecting dorsolaterally.Cloacal opening directed posteriorly at upper level of thighs, presence of a short cloacal flap.
Thenar tubercle large, distinct, transversely oval; palmar tubercle distinct, about the same length as the thenar tubercle.Subarticular tubercles distinct, large, projecting, and single in appearance.Supernumerary tubercles imawari sp.nov.; compare with Fig. 6).The red arrow highlights the distinctly enlarged outer metatarsal tubercle (not enlarged in S. imawari sp.nov.; compare with Fig. 6).Photos by the author numerous, large, and projecting (Fig. 13).Relative finger lengths II < I < IV < III; adpressed second finger barely reaches the first finger's disc.Fingers with lateral fringes; narrow webbing between FIII-FIV, which are fused proximally.Finger discs large, transversely oval, more than two times wider than adjacent phalange on FIII and FIV, smallest and subequal in length on FI and FII, largest and subequal in length on FIII-IV.Largest disc width (FIII) 76% of horizontal length of tympanum.
Inner metatarsal tubercle large, oval, distinct; outer metatarsal tubercle distinct, round, about half the size of the inner metatarsal tubercle.Subarticular tubercles single, round, distinct.Supernumerary tubercles numerous, round, distinct, most of them similar in size, except for one distinctly enlarged supernumerary tubercle below each of the first subarticular tubercles (Fig. 13).Relative lengths of toes I < II < III < V < IV; adpressed fifth toe distinctly longer than third.Toes basally webbed, webs tapering to lateral fringes.Webbing formula I 2-2 + II 1 1 / 2 -3 III 2-3 1 / 2 IV 3 1 / 3 -2 V. Toe discs oval, wider than adjacent phalange, largest toe disc on Toe IV, ca.71% width of largest finger disc.Heels overlapping when hindlimbs are folded at right angles to sagittal body plane.
Colour of holotype in life.Dorsum light to medium brown with a few black and metallic greenish blue spots/ markings (Fig. 11).Flanks speckled with black, dark brown, medium brown and metallic greenish blue, all spots corresponding to individual tubercles or grouping of a few tubercles.Anterodorsal aspect of upper and lower arm light greenish brown, with a few brown patches (very faint transverse bands) and some black/ dark brown markings.Anterodorsal aspect of thigh and shank with ill-defined medium brown and metallic greenish blue transverse bands (the former much wider than the latter), with a few brown and dark brown spots.Hands metallic greenish blue speckled with dark brown/ black; feet metallic greenish blue with ill-defined medium brown transverse markings/bars and some dark brown/ black spots and markings.Top of head and upper eyelid medium brown, similar to dorsum, but without any dark brown/black spot.Canthal stripe black, almost reaching the nostril, short black supratympanic stripe present.Tympanum dark grey, almost black with a few tiny brown speckles, central portion of tympanum greenish brown; tympanum circled in brown and metallic greenish blue.Upper lip metallic greenish blue, with some scattered black and brown spots/markings; lower lip bluish grey with a few dark brown markings.Throat bluish grey, heavily mottled with dark brown.Thorax, venter, and underside of limbs bluish grey, spotted/mottled with dark brown and black.Belly mostly opaque (internal organs barely visible).Palms and soles dark pinkish grey.Iris unicolour, medium brown/copper, with extensive dark brown reticulations.
Colour of holotype in preservative.After almost 12 years in ethanol preservative (Fig. 12), the dorsal colouration turned dark/medium brown with black spots/markings; all metallic greenish blue markings disappeared.The ventral face turned creamy brown, and the medium brown mottling became even more conspicuous.Palms turned light grey, and soles are now dark greyish brown.
Osteology of holotype.Cranium (Fig. 14).The skull is large, wider than long (longest width ca.124% of medial length).The braincase appears mostly ossified; the sphenethmoid complex is dorsally slightly invested by the nasals.The exoccipital-prootic complex is well ossified and laterally overlapped by the otic ramus of the squamosal.The paired septomaxillae are well developed and lie dorsal to the palatine process and posterolaterally to the articulation between the maxilla and premaxilla.The columellae (stapes) are ossified, formed by the synostotic fusion of the long, thin pars media plectri (stylus) and the pars interna plectri (baseplate), which is curved.
Dorsal investing bones.The nasals are broad, not exostosed, not contacting medially.The posteromedial margins of the nasals slightly invest the sphenethmoid.The maxillary process of the nasal is long, acuminate, almost straight in dorsal view, not in contact with the maxilla.The frontoparietals are mostly not exostosed and completely roof the central braincase from the anterior level of the orbit to the level of the tectum synoticum posteriorly.Lamina perpendicularis poorly developed along the anterior orbital margin of the frontoparietal, expanding posteriorly.Posteriorly, the frontoparietal slightly expands dorsally to form a very low frontoparietal crest, which does not bear any conspicuous exostosis.
Ventral investing and palatal bones.The parasphenoid is nib-shaped, forming the floor of the braincase.The pointed cultriform process overlaps the sphenethmoid ventrally.The parasphenoid alary processes provide the floor for the otic capsules and form a slightly obtuse angle with the parasphenoid/cultriform process.The posteromedial process of the parasphenoid is truncate and almost reaches the margin of the foramen magnum.The parasphenoid alary processes are not in contact with the long medial ramus of the pterygoid.The massive neopalatine is fused posteromedially to the sphenethmoid.Postchoanal vomers are straight, clearly distinguishable, anterior to the neopalatine.Each vomer bears ca.1-4 teeth.The postchoanal process of the vomer is moderately long but does not reach the neopalatine.The neopalatine does not connect to the inner surface of the maxilla.
Maxillary arcade.Both maxillae and premaxillae are dentate, apparently not exostosed.The premaxillae are separated medially, slightly inclined anteriorly.The alary processes of the premaxillae are broad and acuminate posteriorly, diverging from the midline.The alary processes are directed posterodorsally and have a moderate indentation along their anteromedial base.In dorsal view, the alary processes reach the level of the anteriormost margin of the maxillae.The palatine (medial) process of the premaxillae is moderately long, acuminate, directed posterodorsally.The lateral process of the premaxillae is short, about half the size of the palatine process, acuminate and directed posterolaterally.The premaxillae do not contact the maxillae, and the premaxillae are not invested by the maxillae.The maxillae are greatly expanded and the pars facialis is well developed but not in contact with the maxillary process of the nasal.Anteriorly and in lateral view, the maxillae are squarish and about twice as high as posteriorly.The maxillae possess a highly reduced (almost non-existent) posterodorsal projection directed towards the zygomatic ramus of the squamosal with which it is not in contact.Posteriorly, the maxillae are partly fused to the robust quadratojugals.
Suspensory apparatus.The triradiate pterygoid is moderately slender.The anterior ramus extends toward the braincase from the maxilla close to the anterior edge of orbit and further extends against the anteroventral margin of the otic capsule via the long medial ramus.There is no contact between the otic capsule and the medial ramus.The posterior ramus is broad and flat, not in contact with the ventral ramus of the squamosal.The posterior ramus is slightly shorter than the medial one.There is a medium dorsal process on the anterior ramus projecting towards the zygomatic ramus of the squamosal, but not contacting it, although these structures are very close to each other.The quadratojugal is robust, partly fused to the maxilla.The otic and ventral rami of the squamosal are well developed; the otic ramus does not extend over the lateral margin of the prootic.The ventral ramus of the squamosal is slightly curved, narrow in lateral view, and extends from the quadratojugal to the posterodorsal margin of the orbit.The otic ramus is acuminate, smooth, and only slightly shorter than the narrower zygomatic ramus.The otic ramus bears a low crest laterally.The zygomatic ramus is moderately long, slim, and acuminate in lateral profile, not in contact with the maxilla.The zygomatic rami do not appear exostosed.
Mandible.The dentary is long and moderately stout, posteriorly acuminate, fused to the small, arcuate mentomeckelian bone anteriorly.The mentomeckelians are separated medially.The dentary overlaps about 1/3 of the angulosplenial length.The main component of the mandible is the angulosplenial, which is long and sigmoid, acuminate anteriorly.Anteriorly and in ventral view, the angulosplenial fails to extend near the maxilla-premaxilla articulation.The coronoid process is dorsomedial and well-developed, about half of the posterior ramus of the pterygoid.
Postcranium (Fig. 9).The vertebral column is composed of eight non-imbricate, procoelous presacral vertebrae, sacrum, and urostyle.The atlantal cotylar arrangement corresponds to the Type I of Lynch [35].Presacrals I-III expand dorsally.The transverse processes are moderately elongated, distally expanded on presacral II-IV.The length of the transverse processes is III > VIII = VII > VI > IV > V > II.The transverse processes of presacral II are directed roughly perpendicularly and ventrally to the medial axis; those of presacral III are directed posteroventrally; transverse processes of presacral IV to VI are directed posterodorsally; and those of presacrals VII and VIII are directed perpendicular and dorsally to the medial axis.Presence of small, paired calcified processes (likely calcified endolymphatic sacs; [36]) extending through the intervertebral foramina, but not, or barely, investing the ventral face of the transverse processes of the vertebrae.The sacral diapophyses are slightly flattened, expanded distally and of similar length to the transverse processes of presacral III.The sacral diapophyses are directed posterodorsally, with truncate distal borders and are not in contact with the ilia distally.The sacrum has a bicondylar articulation with the urostyle.The urostyle is similar in length to the presacral vertebral column, with its posterior tip upturned.It bears a welldeveloped dorsal crest along ca.2/3 of its shaft.The crest starts anteriorly as a large, ossified tubercle and progressively decreases in height in the caudal direction.The pectoral girdle is arciferal.The clavicles are robust, flattened, arcuate, directed anteriorly, and moderately separated from one another medially; the clavicle appears to be barely in contact with the scapula and not attached to the coracoid.The posterior margin of the stout coracoid is weakly sigmoid, whereas the anterior margin is concave.The coracoids are separated and expanded medially, the concave glenoid and straight sternal ends are about equally expanded, almost two times as wide as the midshaft width of the bone.The cleithrum is a dagger-shaped element, the suprascapular cartilage appears to not be ossified.The head of the humerus is not ossified.A welldeveloped crista ventralis extends along the proximal half of the bone.The crista lateralis is well visible in ventral (flexor) view, while the low crista medialis is only visible in lateral view.The capitulum and ulnar and radial condyles appear to be well developed, but decalcified.The olecranon of the radio-ulna is round, the sulcus intermedius is indicated by a distinct groove; the epiphyses of the radius and ulna are decalcified, as well as all carpal elements and the prepollex.The finger phalangeal formula is standard (2-2-3-3), and the metacarpals increase in size in the following order: II, IV, I and III.The relative lengths of the fingers increase in size in the following order: II, I, IV, and III.The third metacarpal is too decalcified to properly appreciate the distal process.The distal phalanges are slightly curved downwards with a pointed tip.The postsacral trunk region is rather long and narrow.The articulation between the anterior end of the ilial shafts and the ventral side of the distal ends of the sacral transverse processes is of the sagittal-hinge type [37], usually characteristic of long-distance jumpers.The ilial shafts have large crests along almost their full length, originating approximately at the level of the urostyle tubercle and terminating in a posterior prominence.The ilia are posteriorly in close contact with the ischium but are apparently not fused to it.The pubis is decalcified; the acetabulum appears round and well developed.The femur is slightly shorter than the tibiofibula.The femur is weakly sigmoid and bears a posteroventral ridge on its proximal end.The sulcus intermedius of the tibiofibula is much less prominent than the sulcus intermedius of the radio-ulna.The astragalus and calcaneum are about two-thirds the size of the tibiofibula.These structures are widely separated at their midpoint and fused at their distal and proximal heads.Tarsal elements are highly decalcified, therefore difficult to appreciate.The toe phalangeal formula is standard (2-2-3-4-3), and the metatarsals increase in size in the following order: I, II, III, V, IV.The relative lengths of the toes increase in the same order.The phalangeal elements are decalcified, the ultimate phalange of the toes appears to be similar in shape and size to that of the fingers.
Distribution and natural history.Stefania upuigmae sp.nov. is only known from the type locality, i.e., the summit of Upuigma-tepui at 2,134 m elevation (Figs. 1  and 2).The summit of Upuigma-tepui is a mix of exposed rocks and richly vegetated areas, described as "low tepuisummit scrub and meadows on peat and rock" by McDiarmid and Donnelly [9] (Fig. 2).The summit is much less fractured than that of Angasima-tepui but is rugged with some deep cracks and narrow canyons (Fig. 2).
The female holotype of Stefania upuigmae sp.nov.was found during the day jumping in low vegetation, likely disturbed by the collectors.The specimen was not It must be noted that two Stefania specimens from Upuigma-tepui are presumably housed in the Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Caracas, Venezuela under the name S. satelles [8].I was unable to examine these specimens, but they most likely represent S. upuigmae.

Discussion
According to Kok et al. [10], the ancestor of Stefania imawari sp.nov.(previously reported as "S.sp.3") diverged from the ancestor of the clade S. upuigmae sp.nov.(previously reported as "S.sp.5") + S. sp. 4 during the Pliocene, ca. 4 Ma, probably by vicariance [10].One can assume that this corresponds to the period Angasima-tepui disconnected and became isolated from what is now Upuigma-tepui and the southeastern part of the Chimantá Massif.The relatively poor morphological differentiation among species in that clade suggests homoplasy or symplesiomorphy, as also observed among tepui summit species in the S. riveroi clade from the Eastern Tepui Chain [28].As mentioned elsewhere [e.g., 14], it is worth pointing out that the sister species of S. upuigmae sp.nov.(S. sp. 4, still undescribed) was previously confused with S. ginesi (e.g., [8,34]) and not with S. satelles as all other members of that subclade (subclade B in Fig. 3).This highlights again how external phenotype alone can be misleading when assessing species diversity in the genus Stefania, especially given the high level of colour polymorphism observed within most species.
Osteological characters are helpful to discriminate among major clades within the genus Stefania, but are overall conserved among closely related species, and thus less conclusive for species recognition, especially across tepui summit populations, possibly also due to homoplasy/symplesiomorphy. The present study provides the first detailed imagery of the full skeleton of S. lathropae (Fig. 15; skull described in [15]), a closely related species, without showing any unambiguous difference with S. imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.
In accordance with criteria B1 and B2a, b [38], i.e., an extent of occurrence < 100 km 2 , an area of occupancy < 10 km 2 , a single known location, and projected decline-due to increasing anthropogenic fires in the region and effects of climate change [11,39]-both Stefania imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.should be listed as Critically Endangered.Anthropogenic fires are reported as a major threat to tepui summit species, especially when their locality of occurrence is small (less than 3 km 2 in Stefania imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.).In 1967 Mayr and Phelps [40] already noted that periodic burnings by residents left only sparse vegetation on most of the slopes of Upuigma-tepui, affecting the local bird fauna (see also [39]).The savannah patches visible in the photograph in Fig. 1 are all caused by anthropogenic fires.

Conclusions
This study brings the number of described Stefania species to 22, making it the largest hemiphractid genus after Gastrotheca (which currently includes 77 species [1]).At least eight species still need to be described in the genus (see [10]; R. MacCulloch, pers.comm.).Stefania imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.are microendemic and morphologically/taxonomically cryptic species belonging to the S. ginesi clade.Described members of the S. ginesi clade are exclusively found on tepui summits between 2,115 and 2,580 m elevation in the Chimantá Massif and peripheral tepuis in the Bolívar State of Venezuela.Both new species are considered critically endangered according to IUCN criteria, mostly due to extremely small occurrence area (less than 3 km 2 ).The population sizes needed to maintain population fitness on such small and isolated tepui summits are unknown.The likely complex population dynamics of isolated tepui summit species should be addressed in further research.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Distribution of species in the Stefania ginesi clade (A).Distribution map of the Stefania ginesi clade as currently understood.Locality data are based on specimens examined (see Appendix) and literature records [8, 14, 15, 34].Inset photos by the author.(B).Aerial photograph of the southern part of the Chimantá massif, taken facing southwest showing the distribution of Stefania imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.Photo by C. Brewer-Carías

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Type localities and habitats of Stefania imawari sp.nov.and S. upuigmae sp.nov.(A).Angasima-tepui as seen from the summit of Upuigma-tepui; black arrow indicates the exact type-locality of S. imawari.(B-D).Vegetation on the summit of Angasima-tepui.(E).Upuigma-tepui as seen from the summit of Angasima-tepui.(F-H).Vegetation on the summit of Upuigma-tepui.Photos by the author

Fig. 3 Fig. 4
Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships of the Stefania ginesi clade modified from [14], based on 2,359 base pairs of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (Bayesian statistical supports are provided at nodes, asterisks indicate values > 95%).Stefania sp. 1 and S. sp. 4 remain undescribed and were both confused with S. ginesi.Photos by the author

Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Three-dimensional models of the complete skeletons of one male paratype of Stefania imawari sp.nov.(IRSNB 4214) and the female holotype (IRSNB 4221), and of the female holotype of S. upuigmae sp.nov.(IRSNB 4222) based on µCT imagery, in dorsal, ventral and left lateral views

Fig. 13
Fig. 13 Palm (A) and sole (B) of the preserved holotype of Stefania upuigmae sp.nov.(IRSNB 4222, female, 53.1 mm SVL).The thin red line highlights a row of distinctly enlarged supernumerary plantar tubercles (absent in S.imawari sp.nov.; compare with Fig.6).The red arrow highlights the distinctly enlarged outer metatarsal tubercle (not enlarged in S. imawari sp.nov.; compare with Fig.6).Photos by the author